If you have a felony conviction, you are almost certainly barred from possessing firearms and ammunition under federal law. Whether you can get those rights back depends on a layered set of rules — the law of your state, whether your conviction was state or federal, and what type of relief you received. This article explains the three main routes (restoration of civil rights, pardon, and expungement or set-aside), why the federal application process is effectively closed to individuals, and the Supreme Court decisions that shape how these rules work in practice.
The Federal Ban and How It Works
18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) makes it a federal crime for any person convicted of a crime punishable by imprisonment for more than one year — generally a felony — to possess a firearm or ammunition. The ban applies whether the conviction is state or federal, and whether or not you ever served time. Violating it carries its own serious federal penalties on top of whatever sentence you already completed.
It is tempting to think that a pardon, an expungement, or simply finishing your sentence erases the federal ban automatically. It does not — at least not by itself. Whether relief actually lifts the federal prohibition depends on a specific statutory exception buried in the definitions section of federal gun law.
The Key: The Unless Clause in § 921(a)(20)
18 U.S.C. § 921(a)(20) defines what counts as a "crime punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding one year" for purposes of the § 922(g)(1) ban. Buried in that definition is the critical relief mechanism: a conviction does not count under the federal ban if the person has been pardoned, had their civil rights restored, or had the conviction expunged or set aside — unless the pardon, restoration, or expungement expressly provides that the person may not possess firearms.
That "unless clause" is what makes state-level relief potentially meaningful at the federal level. But three Supreme Court decisions impose strict limits on how it operates in practice.
Route 1: State Restoration of Civil Rights
After completing a sentence, probation, or parole, many states restore some or all civil rights — commonly the right to vote, to serve on a jury, to hold public office, and in some cases to possess firearms. The process and timing vary widely. Some states restore rights automatically on release from incarceration; others require a waiting period, a petition to a court or board, or a formal order. Rules change through legislation, so you must check your state's current law.
If your state restores civil rights and includes firearm rights in that restoration — and the order does not contain any language expressly restricting you from possessing firearms — the § 921(a)(20) exception can apply and the federal ban may be lifted for a state conviction.
The All-or-Nothing Rule: Caron
There is a major trap here. In Caron v. United States, 524 U.S. 308 (1998), the Supreme Court adopted an "all-or-nothing" reading of the unless clause: if the state restores your civil rights but still prohibits you from possessing any firearm — even just one category, such as handguns — federal law treats your firearm rights as not restored. A partial restoration does not count.
In practice this means you need to read your restoration order, pardon document, or expungement decree carefully, and understand your state's underlying firearms laws, before concluding that the federal ban has been lifted. If your state law still says anything about restricting firearm possession for people with felony records — even something that appears to apply to a narrower category — consult a licensed attorney before drawing conclusions.
Rights Never Actually Lost Cannot Be "Restored": Logan
A second limit comes from Logan v. United States, 552 U.S. 23 (2007). The Court held that civil rights that were never actually taken away cannot be "restored" within the meaning of § 921(a)(20). The restoration exception only applies where rights were genuinely stripped and then affirmatively given back. This matters most for people whose convictions were for offenses that did not result in the loss of civil rights under their state's law — those situations cannot satisfy the restoration exception even if the person later receives some form of relief.
Route 2: Pardon
A pardon is an executive act of forgiveness that can restore rights, including firearm rights. The threshold question is who issued the pardon, because that determines which conviction it can reach.
State pardons are granted by the governor or a pardons board under state law and can potentially satisfy § 921(a)(20) for a state conviction. But the Caron and Logan rules still apply: the pardon must not expressly restrict firearm possession, and your state's underlying law must not continue to bar you. The process, eligibility criteria, and likelihood of success vary widely by state.
Federal pardons are granted by the President under Article II, § 2 of the U.S. Constitution and cover federal offenses only. A presidential pardon is the primary realistic federal path for someone with a federal felony conviction who wants their firearm rights restored.
The Critical Distinction: State vs. Federal Convictions
This is where many people make a costly error. In Beecham v. United States, 511 U.S. 368 (1994), the Supreme Court held that a person convicted of a federal felony must have their rights restored under federal law to qualify for the restoration exception in § 921(a)(20). State relief — a state pardon, a state expungement, or a state civil-rights restoration — does not remove the federal firearm disability flowing from a federal conviction.
If your conviction is federal, only federal action (most practically, a presidential pardon) can lift the firearm disability. State action is irrelevant to a federal conviction's federal consequences.
Route 3: Expungement or Set-Aside
Many states allow people to petition for a conviction to be expunged (destroyed or treated as if it never occurred), sealed (hidden from public view), or set aside (vacated, though the record of the case may remain). What these terms mean, which convictions are eligible, and the waiting periods and costs all vary by state — there is no single national rule.
If a state expungement or set-aside qualifies under § 921(a)(20) and does not expressly restrict firearm possession, it can lift the federal prohibition for a state conviction. The Caron all-or-nothing rule applies here too: if the expungement order or your state's law still limits your firearm rights in any way, the federal ban remains in place. And Beecham applies equally: a state expungement has no effect on the federal firearm disability from a federal conviction.
The Federal Relief Route That Doesn't Work: § 925(c)
On paper, 18 U.S.C. § 925(c) allows a prohibited person to apply to the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) for relief from firearm disabilities. In practice, this route is effectively closed to individuals. Since fiscal year 1993, Congress has included an appropriations rider every year that bars ATF from spending any funds to investigate or act on applications from individual applicants.
In United States v. Bean, 537 U.S. 71 (2002), the Supreme Court confirmed that ATF's inaction due to the funding restriction is not a reviewable "denial" — courts cannot step in to grant relief that ATF has never actually considered or refused. The practical result: unless Congress changes course and re-funds the program, the federal § 925(c) individual-application route does not work.
What You Can Do
- Identify whether your conviction is state or federal. This is the threshold question. State routes can potentially work for state convictions. For a federal conviction, a presidential pardon is the realistic path.
- Obtain your records and any relief documents. Get the original conviction document and — if you have received any relief — the exact text of any pardon, restoration order, or expungement decree. Under the Caron all-or-nothing rule, the precise language matters.
- Research your state's current restoration process. Look for your state's civil-rights restoration procedure, any automatic restoration timelines tied to release or completion of supervision, and whether your offense category is eligible for expungement or set-aside. These rules change through legislation — verify current law, not what you heard years ago.
- Check what the relief actually says about firearms. A pardon or expungement that restores all civil rights is not the same as one that expressly excludes firearms. Under Caron, any restriction on any category of firearm keeps the federal ban in place.
- Do not rely on the federal § 925(c) route. It has been effectively closed to individuals since 1993, and courts cannot order ATF to act on applications (Bean).
- Verify before you possess anything. Even if you believe your rights have been restored, confirm with a licensed attorney in your state before handling any firearm. Incorrect assumptions about restoration have resulted in federal felon-in-possession prosecutions.
A Note on Changing Law
This area of law is not static. Several states have enacted broader expungement laws or "clean slate" statutes in recent years that automatically seal certain records after a crime-free waiting period. Congress periodically debates re-funding the § 925(c) individual relief process. State civil-rights restoration procedures and what they do to firearm rights change through legislation and court decisions. What was true five or ten years ago may not be true today.
This article is general legal information only, not legal advice. The rules discussed here involve complex interactions between federal and state law. A mistake — possessing a firearm before your rights are actually restored — can result in a new federal felony conviction. Eligibility for relief, procedures, waiting periods, costs, and the effect of any relief on firearm rights all vary by state and change over time. Check the current law of your state and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before drawing any conclusions about your own situation.
This article is general legal information, not legal advice, and may not reflect the most current law or the law in your jurisdiction. Laws vary by state and change over time. For advice about your specific situation, consult a licensed attorney.